GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"

[Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!]

Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!

Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.

GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"

video -

The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.

GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke":
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke

More from The Lunduke Journal:
https://lunduke.com/

[QuantumKurator]

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.

You will gnome nothing and be happy.

[Robot Polisher]

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 03:31:01 -0000

Post by QuantumKurator

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked
to a Lunduke article.

You will gnome nothing and be happy.

Not everyone can be a robots.txt polisher.

[Woozy Song]

This is good! That sends a clear signal not go support the gnome project
and not use its software.

I haven't used Gnome since Jesus was goalkeeper for Nazareth FC.

[D]

Post by Woozy Song

This is good! That sends a clear signal not go support the gnome project
and not use its software.

I haven't used Gnome since Jesus was goalkeeper for Nazareth FC.

I will shamelessly steal this response! Brilliant!

[D]

Post by Robot Polisher
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 03:31:01 -0000

Post by QuantumKurator

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked
to a Lunduke article.

You will gnome nothing and be happy.

Not everyone can be a robots.txt polisher.

This is good! That sends a clear signal not go support the gnome project
and not use its software.

I did a review of code of conducts not hostile to people on the political
right, and came up with OpenBSD, slckware, freebsd and debian. I think
OpenBSD had the strongest "shut up and code" philosophy of the four.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking
that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine and
a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux community has
become exactly the monster we were fighting against.

I must get up some T shorts emblazoned with

* 'They are the people they warned you about'*

[CrudeSausage]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking
that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine
and a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux
community has become exactly the monster we were fighting against.

I must get up some T shorts emblazoned with
* 'They are the people they warned you about'*

Indeed, every element a freedom-oriented person would desire is there,
but the people developing those elements are proponents for Marxism and
any other trans fantasy they can come up with.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep
thinking that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate
machine and a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux
community has become exactly the monster we were fighting against.

I must get up some T shorts emblazoned with
* 'They are the people they warned you about'*

Indeed, every element a freedom-oriented person would desire is there,
but the people developing those elements are proponents for Marxism and
any other trans fantasy they can come up with.

Proponents? Protagonists perhaps. Or advocates...Does anybody use
proponent any more?

[D]

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become central
to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking that using
Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine and a world similar
to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux community has become exactly the
monster we were fighting against.

This is very much true! I have worked with the linux foundation, and I can
tell you that it is just full of CV-stuffing, incompetent middle managers
at the top. Really revolting creatures. I also read at the Lunduke site,
that only 2% of their income goes to linux.

So after being exposed to it from the inside, I quickly stopped all
collaboration with them, and I do not accept any of their offers for help
since that would mean I had to adapt to their woke policies, which I never
will, and there was peace. ;)

What I find fun is that every couple of years or so, someone reaches out
and asks me how it comes my events are so successful, and I tell them the
reason is that they are not woke and focus on technology and ban identity
politics.

They then always politely nod, smile, and go away for a few years, while
nothing changes. =)

[CrudeSausage]

Post by D

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking
that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine
and a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux
community has become exactly the monster we were fighting against.

This is very much true! I have worked with the linux foundation, and I
can tell you that it is just full of CV-stuffing, incompetent middle
managers at the top. Really revolting creatures. I also read at the
Lunduke site, that only 2% of their income goes to linux.
So after being exposed to it from the inside, I quickly stopped all
collaboration with them, and I do not accept any of their offers for
help since that would mean I had to adapt to their woke policies, which
I never will, and there was peace. ;)
What I find fun is that every couple of years or so, someone reaches out
and asks me how it comes my events are so successful, and I tell them
the reason is that they are not woke and focus on technology and ban
identity politics.
They then always politely nod, smile, and go away for a few years, while
nothing changes. =)

I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

[Bobbie Sellers]

Post by CrudeSausage
I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

Specifies himself as:

CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

So plonking Crude Sausage who attacks "woke" people instead of
realizing that Jesus taught "Love one another." and apparently believes
all the lies taught in the last 2000 years or so. Well I guess it is
comforting to believe that all the inconveniences he has done to himself
and to others will be forgiven by an ancient human sacrifice.

bliss

[Joel]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by CrudeSausage
I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
So plonking Crude Sausage who attacks "woke" people instead of
realizing that Jesus taught "Love one another." and apparently believes
all the lies taught in the last 2000 years or so. Well I guess it is
comforting to believe that all the inconveniences he has done to himself
and to others will be forgiven by an ancient human sacrifice.

Hi Bobbie! I'm reading you in COLA.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Bobbie Sellers]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by CrudeSausage
I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
So plonking Crude Sausage who attacks "woke" people instead of
realizing that Jesus taught "Love one another." and apparently believes
all the lies taught in the last 2000 years or so. Well I guess it is
comforting to believe that all the inconveniences he has done to himself
and to others will be forgiven by an ancient human sacrifice.

Hi Bobbie! I'm reading you in COLA.

Oh good. I was posting to COLM newsgroup and your remark shows
that I was successful ourside of test groups. After my last big mess
which cost me a lot of my personal history journals I decided COLM might
lend me a bit of insight but I would never post to an advocacy group
except when reply to a posting in another group. That is from hours
mispent in my early middle aga reading comp.sys.amiga.advocacy where
the battles were endless and ultimately totally pointless.

bliss- Dell Precision 7730- PCLOS 2024.07- Linux 6.6.42-Plasma 5.27.11

[Joel]

Post by Bobbie Sellers

Post by Joel
Hi Bobbie! I'm reading you in COLA.

Oh good. I was posting to COLM newsgroup and your remark shows
that I was successful ourside of test groups. After my last big mess
which cost me a lot of my personal history journals I decided COLM might
lend me a bit of insight but I would never post to an advocacy group
except when reply to a posting in another group. That is from hours
mispent in my early middle aga reading comp.sys.amiga.advocacy where
the battles were endless and ultimately totally pointless.
bliss- Dell Precision 7730- PCLOS 2024.07- Linux 6.6.42-Plasma 5.27.11

You have an eighth gen Intel CPU, but running Linux? You are the
baddest mother fucking babe, ever! Right on, Ms. Sellers, my good
friend!!! :D
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by CrudeSausage
I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is
an unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
    So plonking Crude Sausage who attacks "woke" people instead of
realizing that Jesus taught "Love one another." and apparently believes
all the lies taught in the last 2000 years or so.  Well I guess it is
comforting to believe that all the inconveniences he has done to himself
and to others will be forgiven by an ancient human sacrifice.
    bliss

It is not necessary to believe in anything in order to have a faith.

[D]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by CrudeSausage
I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
So plonking Crude Sausage who attacks "woke" people instead of
realizing that Jesus taught "Love one another." and apparently believes
all the lies taught in the last 2000 years or so. Well I guess it is
comforting to believe that all the inconveniences he has done to himself
and to others will be forgiven by an ancient human sacrifice.

I have no quarrel with Christians as long as they don't impose their
values on me. I would never dream of imposing my values on them. Pro-life,
or not, that's all good as far as I am concerned.

Let me also say, that even though I'm not a christian, there are some very
good values inside christianity which more people should follow. Among
other things, family values and building a stable society.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by D
Let me also say, that even though I'm not a christian, there are some
very good values inside christianity which more people should follow.
Among other things, family values and building a stable society.

If Christianity didn't exist, we would have had to invent it.
Oh hang on, that' basically what Paul did, isn't it?

As well as Moses 'here's some tablets I prepared earlier'...

[D]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by D

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking
that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine and a
world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux community has
become exactly the monster we were fighting against.

This is very much true! I have worked with the linux foundation, and I can
tell you that it is just full of CV-stuffing, incompetent middle managers
at the top. Really revolting creatures. I also read at the Lunduke site,
that only 2% of their income goes to linux.
So after being exposed to it from the inside, I quickly stopped all
collaboration with them, and I do not accept any of their offers for help
since that would mean I had to adapt to their woke policies, which I never
will, and there was peace. ;)
What I find fun is that every couple of years or so, someone reaches out
and asks me how it comes my events are so successful, and I tell them the
reason is that they are not woke and focus on technology and ban identity
politics.
They then always politely nod, smile, and go away for a few years, while
nothing changes. =)

I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

Yes, I have noticed, sadly, that there is a lot of woke and socialist
clowns in the open source space, but I guess it is easy to mistake open
source for socialism, if you are no good at thinking. =/

I usually lurk around here, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy and some other
channels.

Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)

[Joel]

Post by D
Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)

If you're running Linux, please do join us.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[D]

Post by Joel

Post by D
Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)

If you're running Linux, please do join us.

Ok, I'll have a look. =)

[Anton Ray Eaks]

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D
Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)

If you're running Linux, please do join us.

Ok, I'll have a look. =)

If you like to ass fuck guys you're Joel's type.

https://postimg.cc/QBGv4Zrz

[D]

Post by Anton Ray Eaks

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D
Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)

If you're running Linux, please do join us.

Ok, I'll have a look. =)

If you like to ass fuck guys you're Joel's type.
https://postimg.cc/QBGv4Zrz

No need... based on the few messages here, it's a complete waste of time.
Just socialists, wokes and probably a negro or two there.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by D

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by D

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep
thinking that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate
machine and a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the
Linux community has become exactly the monster we were fighting
against.

This is very much true! I have worked with the linux foundation, and
I can tell you that it is just full of CV-stuffing, incompetent
middle managers at the top. Really revolting creatures. I also read
at the Lunduke site, that only 2% of their income goes to linux.
So after being exposed to it from the inside, I quickly stopped all
collaboration with them, and I do not accept any of their offers for
help since that would mean I had to adapt to their woke policies,
which I never will, and there was peace. ;)
What I find fun is that every couple of years or so, someone reaches
out and asks me how it comes my events are so successful, and I tell
them the reason is that they are not woke and focus on technology and
ban identity politics.
They then always politely nod, smile, and go away for a few years,
while nothing changes. =)

I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is
an unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

Yes, I have noticed, sadly, that there is a lot of woke and socialist
clowns in the open source space, but I guess it is easy to mistake open
source for socialism, if you are no good at thinking. =/
I usually lurk around here, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy and some other
channels.
Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)

Perhaps, but it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

[Joel]

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Bobbie Sellers]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Are you sure is is not simply an enlarged and slightly
deformed clitoris? Ask her.

bliss -envied Tiresias when rather young to have heard of that notable
ancient.

[Joel]

Post by Bobbie Sellers

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Are you sure is is not simply an enlarged and slightly
deformed clitoris? Ask her.

She's a trans woman.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Classic.

[Mr Ön!on]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Classic.
--
CrudeSausage

I wonder if JoJo [snigger] still enjoys his own penis.

[D]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

[Ahem A Rivet's Shot]

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that produce
the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or female
genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other strongly and
fairly uniformly.

[yeti]

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
(with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
answers.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by yeti

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
(with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
answers.

Reality is a social construct.

That is the new mantra of those who did philosophy, and socialogy, but
completely failed to understand what they were being taught.

[D]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by yeti

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
(with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
answers.

Reality is a social construct.
That is the new mantra of those who did philosophy, and socialogy, but
completely failed to understand what they were being taught.

And a dangerous one. Being hit in the head with a socially constructed
rock, still hurts! ;) But I certainly wouldn't mind if a lot of socialists
here did try to jump out the window, since gravity is obviously a social
construct! ;)

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by D

Post by The Natural Philosopher
Reality is a social construct.
That is the new mantra of those who did philosophy, and socialogy, but
completely failed to understand what they were being taught.

And a dangerous one. Being hit in the head with a socially constructed
rock, still hurts! ;) But I certainly wouldn't mind if a lot of
socialists here did try to jump out the window, since gravity is
obviously a social construct! ;)

Oh that's easy, self identify as a carrion crow and Robert is a relative.

[D]

Post by yeti

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
(with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
answers.

Except that gender is a fact with short and simple answers. Only
socialist, woke people and retards do not understand what a man and a
woman is.

[yeti]

Post by D

Post by yeti

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
(with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
answers.

Except that gender is a fact with short and simple answers. Only
socialist, woke people and retards do not understand what a man and a
woman is.

Pasta & Ramen!

[Andreas Eder]

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that produce
the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or female
genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other strongly and
fairly uniformly.

Yes, and sometimes the X or Y chromosomes are doubled.
The world os a lot more complex than most people think.

'Andreas

[D]

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that produce
the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or female
genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other strongly and
fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a useful
guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or perhaps
the ability of having a child. It is really a very trivial question.

The only ones trying to make it not trivial, and failing miserably, are
the woke and socialist crowd.

[Ahem A Rivet's Shot]

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200

Post by D

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200

Post by D

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

Actually it is.

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200

Post by D

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

Actually it is.

It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
investigations.

[Joel]

Post by Chris Ahlstrom

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200

Post by D

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

Actually it is.

It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
investigations.

Right, see: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955456/
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Chris Ahlstrom

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200

Post by D

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

Actually it is.

It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
investigations.

We gave up on Lysenkoism, and eugenics, too.

[D]

Post by Chris Ahlstrom

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200

Post by D

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

Actually it is.

It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
investigations.

Yep, very easy. Do you have a Y, male, do you not have a Y, female.
Problem solved!

[Ahem A Rivet's Shot]

On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:10:09 +0200

Post by D
Yep, very easy. Do you have a Y, male, do you not have a Y, female.
Problem solved!

A perfect example of an answer that is simple, clear and wrong!

There are males (penis, testicles, hairy, muscular ...) with no Y
chromosone and there are females (vagina, ovaries, mammaries ...) with a Y
chromosone. The triggering gene for being male is usually found on the Y
chromosone but it can exist and function on an X chromosone and it can also
fail to function on a Y chromosone.

The complications arise from the fact that it is a triggering gene
and the full set of activations and cascades that derive from it have yet
to be mapped but certainly don't always go the same way resulting in women
with masculine characteristics and vice-versa. When this affects brain
development it can result in gender dysphoria and transgender people.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:10:09 +0200

Post by D
Yep, very easy. Do you have a Y, male, do you not have a Y, female.
Problem solved!

A perfect example of an answer that is simple, clear and wrong!
There are males (penis, testicles, hairy, muscular ...) with no Y
chromosone and there are females (vagina, ovaries, mammaries ...) with a Y
chromosone. The triggering gene for being male is usually found on the Y
chromosone but it can exist and function on an X chromosone and it can also
fail to function on a Y chromosone.
The complications arise from the fact that it is a triggering gene
and the full set of activations and cascades that derive from it have yet
to be mapped but certainly don't always go the same way resulting in women
with masculine characteristics and vice-versa. When this affects brain
development it can result in gender dysphoria and transgender people.

And how many of today's 'transgender people' have modified genetics?
Especially the ones responsible for rape....and infesting women's sports...

One swallow doth not a Summer make.

The Art Student always says that because something is possible, it is
therefore desirable, inevitable, or the norm, or needs some special
attention

Normal people simply say that they should make the rules for normal
people. And not pretend that abnormal people are in any way normal

Transgender is just another Marxist Fad designed to disrupt normal
society. It has nothing whatever to do with genetics or DNA.

[D]

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200

Post by D

Post by Ahem A Rivet's Shot
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200

Post by D
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
strongly and fairly uniformly.

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Post by D
Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.

You don't know much about it. For example:

https://www.genome.gov/27557513/the-y-chromosome-beyond-gender-determination

Although the Y chromosome's role in sex determination is clear, research
has shown that it is undergoing rapid evolutionary deterioration. Many
generations ago the Y chromosome was large, and contained as many genes as
the X chromosome. Now it is a fraction of its past size and contains fewer
than 80 functional genes. This has led to debates and concerns over the
years regarding the Y chromosome's eventual destiny. Many speculate that
the Y chromosome has become superfluous and could completely decay within
the next 10 million years. While studies of the Y chromosome have been
challenging due to the palindromic and repeat-rich nature of its DNA
sequence, recent genomic advances have provided some unexpected insights.

It ain't simple, stupid. Read the literature, get acquainted with the findings,
:-D "edgelord" :-D.

Heh heh:

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Chris Ahlstrom

Post by D
Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.

https://www.genome.gov/27557513/the-y-chromosome-beyond-gender-determination
Although the Y chromosome's role in sex determination is clear, research
has shown that it is undergoing rapid evolutionary deterioration. Many
generations ago the Y chromosome was large, and contained as many genes as
the X chromosome. Now it is a fraction of its past size and contains fewer
than 80 functional genes. This has led to debates and concerns over the
years regarding the Y chromosome's eventual destiny. Many speculate that
the Y chromosome has become superfluous and could completely decay within
the next 10 million years. While studies of the Y chromosome have been
challenging due to the palindromic and repeat-rich nature of its DNA
sequence, recent genomic advances have provided some unexpected insights.
It ain't simple, stupid. Read the literature, get acquainted with the findings,
:-D "edgelord" :-D.

Read the fictional literature and you too will Believe, drink the
koolaid, and die happy..

I see none of the research that is 'supporting' these conclusions is
specified.

If people don't have biological sex with each other the species will die
out.

Darwin Rules OK?

[CrudeSausage]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Chris Ahlstrom

Post by D
Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.

https://www.genome.gov/27557513/the-y-chromosome-beyond-gender-determination
     Although the Y chromosome's role in sex determination is clear,
research
     has shown that it is undergoing rapid evolutionary deterioration.
Many
     generations ago the Y chromosome was large, and contained as many
genes as
     the X chromosome. Now it is a fraction of its past size and
contains fewer
     than 80 functional genes. This has led to debates and concerns
over the
     years regarding the Y chromosome's eventual destiny.  Many
speculate that
     the Y chromosome has become superfluous and could completely
decay within
     the next 10 million years. While studies of the Y chromosome have
been
     challenging due to the palindromic and repeat-rich nature of its DNA
     sequence, recent genomic advances have provided some unexpected
insights.
It ain't simple, stupid. Read the literature, get acquainted with the findings,
:-D "edgelord" :-D.

Read the fictional literature and you too will Believe, drink the
koolaid, and die happy..
I see none of the research that is 'supporting'  these conclusions is
specified.
If people don't have biological sex with each other the species will die
out.
Darwin Rules OK?

They _want_ the species to die out because in addition to believing that
the planet is dying, they believe that it is overpopulated. People need
to consider that the next time they come out with a vaccine which is
either rumoured or shown to cause people to die.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

It's just another DILLIGAFF.

There was a boy in a frock in my old college's bar. I was there for a
reunion thing.
No one took any notice.
He stormed out in a huff.

[D]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

It's just another DILLIGAFF.
There was a boy in a frock in my old college's bar. I was there for a reunion
thing.
No one took any notice.
He stormed out in a huff.

True. A lot of it is just attention seeking, virtue signalling and in
darker cases, badly disguised attempts at power grabbing through woke
politics.

The best way is to just ignore them, or in more serious cases, tell them
to get the f*ck out of where ever they are.

I have used both techniques with great success, but option 2 is a lot of
fun! =)

[Joel]

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

[Kerr-Mudd, John]

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:15:26 +0100

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

How about taking this to a relevant NG?
FU: afc dropped

[Joel]

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:15:26 +0100

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

How about taking this to a relevant NG?
FU: afc dropped

If you had simply ignored the post, I wouldn't have written this
reply, with your Followup-To header rejected.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.

Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
men and women.

In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
reality and derangement.

[Joel]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.

Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
men and women.
In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
reality and derangement.

That's typical phobe talk, sure.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.

Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
men and women.
In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
reality and derangement.

That's typical phobe talk, sure.

lala! put your hands hands over your ears and be in denial of anything
that contradicts the fantasy.

No one is remotely *scared* of 'transgender' people. Well not outside of
women who have to share a prison s or a toilet with an erect penis on
testosterone on the prowl.
So phobia cannot be the right word.
Once again you show yourself to be delusional.

You don't scare anyone, and neither does your boyfriend.
Lets do a deal. I wont tell you about what I do in the bedroom if you
will simply stop boring me with what you do.

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel
She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.

Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
men and women.
In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
reality and derangement.

That's typical phobe talk, sure.

lala! put your hands hands over your ears and be in denial of anything
that contradicts the fantasy.
No one is remotely *scared* of 'transgender' people. Well not outside of
women who have to share a prison s or a toilet with an erect penis on
testosterone on the prowl.
So phobia cannot be the right word.
Once again you show yourself to be delusional.
You don't scare anyone, and neither does your boyfriend.
Lets do a deal. I wont tell you about what I do in the bedroom if you
will simply stop boring me with what you do.

No. You will acclimate to this, whenever it finally gets through to
you. We will not relent on de-marginalizing trans people.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel
No. You will acclimate to this, whenever it finally gets through to
you. We will not relent on de-marginalizing trans people.

Are you threatening me? You are trying to *induce* transphobia, aren't
you, by means of threats?

Poor little Joel. Desperately wanting any emotional reaction other than
a yawn and a 'put a sock in the transgender thing, there's a good chap.'

How did Kipling put it...

"Sore, sleepy, and hungry as he was, Mowgli could not help laughing when
the Bandar-log began, twenty at a time, to tell him how great and wise
and strong and gentle they were, and how foolish he was to wish to leave
them. "We are great. We are free. We are wonderful. We are the most
wonderful people in all the jungle! We all say so, and so it must be
true," they shouted. "Now as you are a new listener and can carry our
words back to the Jungle-People so that they may notice us in future, we
will tell you all about our most excellent selves." Mowgli made no
objection, and the monkeys gathered by hundreds and hundreds on the
terrace to listen to their own speakers singing the praises of the
Bandar-log, and whenever a speaker stopped for want of breath they would
all shout together: "This is true; we all say so." Mowgli nodded and
blinked, and said "Yes" when they asked him a question, and his head
spun with the noise. "Tabaqui the Jackal must have bitten all these
people," he said to himself, "and now they have madness. Certainly this
is dewanee, the madness. Do they never go to sleep? Now there is a cloud
coming to cover that moon. If it were only a big enough cloud I might
try to run away in the darkness. But I am tired."

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel
No. You will acclimate to this, whenever it finally gets through to
you. We will not relent on de-marginalizing trans people.

Are you threatening me? You are trying to *induce* transphobia, aren't
you, by means of threats?

It's no threat, it's a statement of fact. Time is on the side of
people realizing truth.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.

LOL!

Do you really think *people* have changed in the last 20 years?
Bless!

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

She's [Joel Crump's GF] biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.

LOL!
Do you really think *people* have changed in the last 20 years?
Bless!

People are meant to evolve, to gain intelligence, awareness, people in
2024 ought to be more cognizant of the trans identity concept, but in
a place like this, an Internet relic, you have people running Windows
XP and talking like it's still 1992. It's amazing, how people get
"set in their ways", as they say, and make asses of themselves,
spewing outmoded and discredited views.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel
People are meant to evolve, to gain intelligence, awareness

Says who?

Honestly your mind is a mess of weird ideas.
No one is meant to do anything.
Those that manage to find sexual partners of the opposite sex and
produce children have their genes survicve. Those that do not, wont.

Post by Joel
people in
2024 ought

Another word not in Naturee's dictionary. No one 'ought' to be or think
or do anything,.

Post by Joel
to be more cognizant of the trans identity concept,

Why? I dont demand that you become cognisant of Druid ceremonies of the
century three hundred years before Christ? Or thge works of Brighanm
Young and teh church of the latter day saiunts?

Post by Joel
but in
a place like this, an Internet relic, you have people running Windows
XP and talking like it's still 1992.

"They think they're so clever and classless and free
But they're still fucking peasants, far as I can see"

Post by Joel
It's amazing, how people get
"set in their ways", as they say, and make asses of themselves,
spewing outmoded and discredited views.

Well don't do it.

'Transgender' is so 2023....

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel
People are meant to evolve, to gain intelligence, awareness

Says who?
Honestly your mind is a mess of weird ideas.
No one is meant to do anything.
Those that manage to find sexual partners of the opposite sex and
produce children have their genes survicve. Those that do not, wont.

Post by Joel
people in
2024 ought

Another word not in Naturee's dictionary. No one 'ought' to be or think
or do anything,.

That's what people stuck in their ways say, yeah, we know.

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel
to be more cognizant of the trans identity concept,

Why? I dont demand that you become cognisant of Druid ceremonies of the
century three hundred years before Christ? Or thge works of Brighanm
Young and teh church of the latter day saiunts?

None of that has to do with being tolerant of people in today's world.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[D]

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

[Joel]

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[%]

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

but is he female mentally , emotionally or is he just a dick to suck

[CrudeSausage]

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

Nobody is scared of you or him. We'll also be keeping our children away
from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

[Joel]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

Nobody is scared of you or him. We'll also be keeping our children away
from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
dream on.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

Nobody is scared of you or him. We'll also be keeping our children away
from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
dream on.

ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
cock if it doesn't go too well for you?

[Joel]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Nobody is scared of you [Joel Crump] or him [Joel's trans GF being misgendered by the phobe]. We'll also be keeping our children away
from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
dream on.

ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
cock if it doesn't go too well for you?

Hint: men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Nobody is scared of you [Joel Crump] or him [Joel's trans GF being misgendered by the phobe]. We'll also be keeping our children away
from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
dream on.

ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
cock if it doesn't go too well for you?

Hint: men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.

ROFL! Alright, into the bin you go.

[chrisv]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel
Hint: men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.

ROFL! Alright, into the bin you go.

Well, his spew is constantly *beyond* ridiculous. It's a total troll.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Joel

Nobody is scared of you [Joel Crump] or him [Joel's trans GF being misgendered by the phobe]. We'll also be keeping our children away
from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
dream on.

ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
cock if it doesn't go too well for you?

Hint: men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.

Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.

Yawn.

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel
men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.

Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.
Yawn.

Not what I said. <yawn>
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel
men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.

Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.
Yawn.

Not what I said. <yawn>

Pretty much exactly what you said.
Now its the dawn chorus outside and I am getting totally bored with your
narcissism so its time to plonk you
Bye, and have a miserable life.

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel
men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.

Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.
Yawn.

Not what I said. <yawn>

Pretty much exactly what you said.
Now its the dawn chorus outside and I am getting totally bored with your
narcissism so its time to plonk you
Bye, and have a miserable life.

I win.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

You are the phobe dear.

Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel
My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

You are the phobe dear.
Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
trans women, and my sexual history.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel
My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

You are the phobe dear.
Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
trans women, and my sexual history.

That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly boring and open
about it. Trying to convince yourself.
I don't really give a fuck.

I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

[Joel]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher
You are the phobe dear.
Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
trans women, and my sexual history.

That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly boring and open
about it. Trying to convince yourself.
I don't really give a fuck.
I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

I am just indifferent to being seen naked by the public.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[D]

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel
My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

You are the phobe dear.
Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
trans women, and my sexual history.

That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly boring and open
about it. Trying to convince yourself.
I don't really give a fuck.
I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

I think you're close to the truth here. Not only is it revolting and a
sick lifestyle, I think as you say, that it is a marker of significant
mental illness. It expresses that he deep down feels like he has no worth,
and the only way he gets attention and "love" is to be revolting and being
used.

Sadly, it will probably end in alcohol and drugs and an early death if he
doesn't change his life.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel
My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

You are the phobe dear.
Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
trans women, and my sexual history.

That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly  boring and
open about it. Trying to convince yourself.
I don't really give a fuck.
I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

I think you're close to the truth here. Not only is it revolting and a
sick lifestyle, I think as you say, that it is a marker of significant
mental illness. It expresses that he deep down feels like he has no
worth, and the only way he gets attention and "love" is to be revolting
and being used.
Sadly, it will probably end in alcohol and drugs and an early death if
he doesn't change his life.

Not necessarily. Many narcissists last a long time by the simple
expedient of never taking on blame themselves but projecting it onto
others.

AS the ultimate egotists, they don't do drugs that reduce or threaten
ego, So no hallucinogens or other psychedelics. They tend to prefer ego
enhancers like amphetamines or cocaine.

Control is everything. Even alcohol may be to much

They think of themselves as tough, and smart.

[Joel]

Post by D

Post by The Natural Philosopher

Post by Joel

Post by The Natural Philosopher
You are the phobe dear.
Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
trans women, and my sexual history.

That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly boring and open
about it. Trying to convince yourself.
I don't really give a fuck.
I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

I think you're close to the truth here. Not only is it revolting and a
sick lifestyle, I think as you say, that it is a marker of significant
mental illness. It expresses that he deep down feels like he has no worth,
and the only way he gets attention and "love" is to be revolting and being
used.
Sadly, it will probably end in alcohol and drugs and an early death if he
doesn't change his life.

That's stupid.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by D

Post by Joel

Post by CrudeSausage
it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
Joel Crump will react to your posts.

My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.

Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

+1

[D]

Post by D

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by D

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking
that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine and
a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux community has
become exactly the monster we were fighting against.

This is very much true! I have worked with the linux foundation, and I
can tell you that it is just full of CV-stuffing, incompetent middle
managers at the top. Really revolting creatures. I also read at the
Lunduke site, that only 2% of their income goes to linux.
So after being exposed to it from the inside, I quickly stopped all
collaboration with them, and I do not accept any of their offers for help
since that would mean I had to adapt to their woke policies, which I
never will, and there was peace. ;)
What I find fun is that every couple of years or so, someone reaches out
and asks me how it comes my events are so successful, and I tell them the
reason is that they are not woke and focus on technology and ban identity
politics.
They then always politely nod, smile, and go away for a few years, while
nothing changes. =)

I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?

Yes, I have noticed, sadly, that there is a lot of woke and socialist
clowns in the open source space, but I guess it is easy to mistake open
source for socialism, if you are no good at thinking. =/
I usually lurk around here, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy and some other
channels.
Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look at
comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)

Perhaps, but it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like Chris
Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like Joel Crump
will react to your posts.

Oh, I think it is not difficult to predict the reaction. Either they will
eventually block me, I will block them, we might block each other, or if
the group is woke enough, I will just lose interest and delete it from my
reader. ;)

[[e-mail]]

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.

Gnome SUCKS anyway.

[D]

Post by ***@ud0s4.net

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.

Gnome SUCKS anyway.

This is the truth!

[[e-mail]]

Post by D

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.

 Gnome SUCKS anyway.

This is the truth!

It went in a really weird direction. Can't STAND it.

Still don't understand why the RHEL derivs all still
use it by default. Makes them totally annoying/offensive
to use.

[D]

Post by ***@ud0s4.net

Post by D

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.

 Gnome SUCKS anyway.

This is the truth!

It went in a really weird direction. Can't STAND it.
Still don't understand why the RHEL derivs all still
use it by default. Makes them totally annoying/offensive
to use.

I find it ok, but too big and clunky. So I've been on xfce for many years
and have experimented with dwm from time to time. I am curious about cwm
though, maybe that could be worthwhile exploring! =)

[CrudeSausage]

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.

  Gnome SUCKS anyway.

KDE sucks more though.

[[e-mail]]

Post by CrudeSausage

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.

   Gnome SUCKS anyway.

KDE sucks more though.

KDE is much more "usable" ... however at this
point it's become insanely fat, drags down the
CPU unacceptably and far MORE places where it
can go wrong. Seems to want to be Winders.

LXDE/XFCE *much* better.

[Joel]

Post by ***@ud0s4.net

Post by CrudeSausage

   Gnome SUCKS anyway.

KDE sucks more though.

KDE is much more "usable" ... however at this
point it's become insanely fat, drags down the
CPU unacceptably and far MORE places where it
can go wrong. Seems to want to be Winders.
LXDE/XFCE *much* better.

Anyone clueful would be running Mint Cinnamon.
--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[CrudeSausage]

Post by Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther!
Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
video - http://youtu.be/HZ64k2BXAjs
The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
Lunduke article.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
https://lunduke.com/

Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.

Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking
that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine and
a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux community has
become exactly the monster we were fighting against.

[John Ames]

Someone want to explain what this cretinous edgelord drama is doing in
alt.folklore.computers?

[Kerr-Mudd, John]

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:44:05 -0700

Post by John Ames
Someone want to explain what this cretinous edgelord drama is doing in
alt.folklore.computers?

[this NG only]

Trolls just keep on trolling. fu to bit bucket.