Discussion:
How to satisfy the bottom-posting pedants (and thereby show that the whole argument is a storm in a teacup?)
Add Reply
gareth evans
2021-09-28 08:22:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Take the post to which you are replying, let one word
only of the post to be quoted, then put the whole
of your otherwise-top-posted reply in there, followed
by the remainder of what you are quoting.

Everybody happy?
D.J.
2021-09-28 21:37:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:22:45 +0100, gareth evans
Post by gareth evans
Take the post to which you are replying, let one word
only of the post to be quoted, then put the whole
of your otherwise-top-posted reply in there, followed
by the remainder of what you are quoting.
Everybody happy?
Nope, because top posting is unacceptible.
gareth evans
2021-09-29 15:36:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by D.J.
N
Do you mean, "unacceptable"?
Post by D.J.
ope, because top posting is unacceptible.
D.J.
2021-09-29 18:29:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:36:35 +0100, gareth evans
Post by gareth evans
Post by D.J.
N
Do you mean, "unacceptable"?
Post by D.J.
ope, because top posting is unacceptible.
Well, no I don't.

maus
2021-09-29 17:00:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by D.J.
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:22:45 +0100, gareth evans
Post by gareth evans
Take the post to which you are replying, let one word
only of the post to be quoted, then put the whole
of your otherwise-top-posted reply in there, followed
by the remainder of what you are quoting.
Everybody happy?
Nope, because top posting is unacceptible.
++
--
***@mail.com
Down the wrong mousehole.
Loading...